SC Directs Army Trust To Approach Delhi HC Over Plea Seeking Removal Of Disparity In Pensionery Benefit To Different Armed Forces

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the petitioner, a trust, to approach the Delhi High Court seeking directions to the Union of India (UoI) on the removal of disparity in pensionery benefit to the personnel of armed forces under the Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Defence.
A two-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao and also comprising Justice S Ravindra Bhatt, asked the petitioner, Humara Desh Humare Jawan Trust, to approach the Delhi High Court with its prayers.
The petition, filed by Humara Desh Humare Jawan Trust in the apex court, sought orders to the UOI to remove disparity in pensionery benefit and to extend the same benefit (old Pension Scheme) to the personnel of armed forces under the Ministry of Home, as is given to the Armed forces personnel under the Ministry of Defence.
The petitioner, Humara Desh Humare Jawan Trust, which works for the cause of armed forces personnel of the country and their families, had filed the plea before the Supreme Court, through a lawyer, Ajay Kumar Agrawal.
The petitioner pleaded to the Supreme Court to direct the Union of India (UOI) to remove the disparity in pensionery benefit and to extend the same benefit (old Pension Scheme) to the personnel of armed forces under the MHA.
“These includes forces which come under the Ministry of Defence i.e., Army, Air Force and Navy and armed forces which comes under the Ministry of Home Affairs i.e., Border Security Force, Central Industrial Security Force, Central Reserve Police Force, Indo Tibetan Border Police, National Security Guard, Assam Rifles and Shashastra Seva Bal,” the petition claimed.
On January 1, 2004, a new contributory pension scheme was launched by the Government of India which came into effect from January 1, 2004, the petition said.
“The Central government is applying a hybrid pension scheme which is a mixture of old and new pension scheme to the personnel of armed forces which came under the MHA, and who joined the service after January 1, 2004. But it is specifically provided that this new contributory pension scheme is not applicable to the armed forces of UOI,” it claimed.
The Central Government had erroneously extended the provisions of notification of December 22, 2003, to Armed Forces of the Ministry of Home and despite several representations, nothing has been done so far, the petition filed through a lawyer, Ajay Agrawal said.
This is a violation of the principle of equality and armed forces under the Ministry of Home are these are being discriminated. Both are armed forces of the Union under the Ministry of Defence and Home, therefore, there should be no disparity and same pensionary benefits be given to both, the petition stated.


Support Ethical Journalism. Support The Dispatch

The Dispatch is a sincere effort in ethical journalism. Truth, Accuracy, Independence, Fairness, Impartiality, Humanity and Accountability are key elements of our editorial policy. But we are still not able to generate great stories, because we don’t have adequate resources. As more and more media falls into corporate and political control, informed citizens across the world are funding independent journalism initiatives. Here is your chance to support your local media startup and help independent journalism survive. Click the link below to make a payment of your choice and be a stakeholder in public spirited journalism


The Dispatch is present across a number of social media platforms. Subscribe to our YouTube channel for exciting videos; join us on Facebook, Intagram and Twitter for quick updates and discussions. We are also available on the Telegram. Follow us on Pinterest for thousands of pictures and graphics. We care to respond to text messages on WhatsApp at 8082480136 [No calls accepted]. To contribute an article or pitch a story idea, write to us at [email protected] |Click to know more about The Dispatch, our standards and policies